Keep the DREAM Alive


Image Credit: The Atlantic

In a nation built on the backs of immigrants, slaves, and the working class, over 800,000 young undocumented immigrants currently enrolled in DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) are under attack. (1) After President Trump’s decision to terminate DACA, there has been a nationwide scramble to find a legislative solution to keep the program intact or otherwise let it dissolve all together. DACA is a 2012 program from the Obama administration that allows young people brought to this country illegally to stay temporarily and promises education and economic mobility. It was enacted via executive order as a temporary solution after the fail of the DREAM act — a bill proposed to protect and provide citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (2) DACA was a controversial use of President Obama’s executive power, and has been deemed unconstitutional by some on the right.

On the campaign trail, President Trump pledged to mobilize deportations of all illegal immigrants — and is giving a 6-month delay for the end of the program, allowing Congress to act on the issue. This is especially alarming for DREAMers who have their legal status and the ability to maintain their families suddenly cut short. Some DACA recipients (dubbed the “DREAMers”) have reportedly already undergone targeted arrests by agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and it is unclear whether they “would become ripe targets for deportation” — living every day as if it were their last in America. (3)

The vendetta here is between legality vs. humanitarian efforts; laws are created to maintain a rule of order whereas humanitarianism focuses on alleviating human suffering. Here, the abidance of strict immigration laws is contested with the sympathy for undocumented minors who will lose their quality of life if DACA ends. Trump’s core believes that by not incriminating undocumented immigrants, the rule of law is undermined and holds less value. However, this comes at the expense of destroying the lives of a vulnerable and marginalized population. Despite these two perspectives, many politicians from both sides of the aisle have voiced their frustration with the President’s decision, and support legislation keeping the program in place permanently because they see the value in keeping DREAMers in the country. As Kevin Price from the Huffington Post states: “there is widespread support for major elements of DACA and massive disdain for its elimination entirely” by the majority of the actors interested in the legislation. (4)

DACA’s proponents argue that by forcing deportations of young people, there will be negative consequences for both DACA recipients and the U.S economy:

Social Impacts:

  • No morality in punishing DREAMers for a crime they are not legally responsible for. Ilya Somin from The Washington Post argues that “the vast majority of undocumented migrants were justified in acting illegally because of the dire circumstances they [were] fleeing…”. (5)
  • Sending innocent youth back to a country that is completely foreign to them

Fiscal Impacts:

  • Removing DREAMers creates instability in the workforce that depends on them
  • Reduces immigrant contributions to the U.S by removing a path to higher education for undocumented students
  • According to a Cato Institute study, deportations “could cost the government at least $60 billion. Overall, rescinding the program would reduce economic growth by $280 billion.” (6) Widespread deportation is expensive and difficult to implement, resulting in a negative impact for American citizens.

On the other hand, opponents of the permanent implementation of the program argue that DACA poses a threat to American lives and burdens them economically:

  • Unlawful behavior, such as illegally immigrating, is “rewarded” and therefore promoted — which can give incentive to breaking the law.  In “Why Trump Must End DACA”, Dale Wilcox reasons that: “should the new administration signal that it too is unwilling to enforce our immigration laws fairly…the flood over our borders will become a torrent.” (7)
  • Racialized stereotypes of dangerous criminals crossing the border illegally fuel arguments that DACA stimulates violence
  • Anti-immigrant biases assume loss of American jobs with DACA being permanently implemented.  However, a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine finds that immigrant labor has: “ little to no negative effects on overall wages and employment of native-born workers” and rather bolsters the U.S economy. (8)

By seeking to find and conflate negative stereotypes of immigrants, opponents fail to acknowledge the context of the lives of undocumented minors and their situation. The clear benefit DREAMers pose to U.S society and the suffering they endure is ultimately invisibilized.

DACA is set to expire on March 5th, 2018 under the Trump administration. There are several bills being proposed “that would provide permanent residence benefits and a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers”, according to Allen Smith from the Society of Human Resource Management. (9) Among them, the American Hope Act of 2017, the Recognizing America’s Children Act, and two versions of the Dream Act 2017. What all these solutions have in common is that they all provide a pathway for undocumented citizens to receive legal status in this country. Pros for bills that would allow DACA recipients to stay in the country are:

  • Protects innocent lives of DREAMers
  • More professionals contributing to U.S society if allowed to stay and attain higher education
  • Economic and social environment remains stable if undocumented DREAMers are given legal permission to stay in country. As Senator Marco Rubio puts it: “the impact [of the termination of DACA] would be very disruptive. Not just in [the DREAMers] lives, but for their employers.” (10)

Realistically, the most beneficial solution to American society as a whole would be providing a legal pathway for DACA recipients to obtain citizenship or permanent residency in the United States. Although some may believe that DREAMers take jobs from citizens and leech off society, they contribute to the United States economically and socially through their hard work and education. DREAMers constantly have to battle between the ups and downs of their temporary legal status, and the majority only wish to support themselves and their family.


Take Action

To learn more about DACA, visit to learn more about how to apply for DACA and how to attain resources available for DREAMers. (11) To voice your concerns about the termination of DACA, please go to: ( for a helpful guide on how to call your representatives and utilize social media to push for permanent protection for undocumented immigrants. (12) For a short video documenting how DREAMers feel about DACA’s removal, watch: (13)




3 .







10 .






Cassandra Morales is a Political Science and Anthropology student at Wellesley College. In addition to being a Policy Corner Writer for PVNN, she dedicates her time working with the largest Latinx-run organization at Wellesley - MEZCLA - as Political Action Chair. As a daughter of immigrants and a first-generation college student, she has strong ambitions to fight for social equality and the rights of marginalized communities. She considers herself socially and fiscally liberal, with a willingness to debate with an open-mind. As a writer, she is mostly focused on health care, race relations, and civil rights.